Howard Zinn interview forwarded to me by the upgrade. Despite the piece being fairly apallingly edited (for crying out loud, read over yer transcriptions) and the interviewer veers towards sycophancy, as comrades tend to do with much loved radical academics, Zinn makes some nice clear points about anarchism, especially opposition to government that I am generally not eloquent enough to deal with. Usually just resort to babbling something about without authority not meaning without order etc. Bleurgh. Anyway: voting bad but not verboten, engaged activism good.
